'Anti-antibiotic' allows for use of antibiotics without driving resistance
An inexpensive, FDA-approved drug — cholestyramine — taken in conjunction with an antibiotic prevents the antibiotic from driving antimicrobial resistance, according to new research by scientists at Penn State and the University of Michigan. The team’s findings appear today (Dec. 1) in the journal eLife.
“Antimicrobial resistance is a serious problem that has led to people dying from common bacterial infections,” said Andrew Read, Evan Pugh Professor of Biology and Entomology and director of the Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, Penn State. “Many of our most important antibiotics are failing, and we are beginning to run out of options. We have created a therapy that may help in the fight against antimicrobial resistance, an ‘anti-antibiotic’ that allows antibiotic treatment without driving the evolution and onward transmission of resistance.”
According to Valerie Morley, postdoctoral scholar in the Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, Penn State, an important cause of antibiotic-resistant infections in healthcare settings is vancomycin-resistant [VR] Enterococcus faecium.
“E. faecium is an opportunistic pathogen that colonizes the human gastrointestinal tract and spreads via fecal-oral transmission,” she said. “The bacterium is asymptomatic in the gut but can cause serious infections, such as sepsis and endocarditis, when introduced to sites like the bloodstream or the spinal cord.”
Morley noted that daptomycin is one of the few remaining antibiotics to treat VR E. faecium infection, yet VR E. faecium is quickly becoming resistant to daptomycin as well. Daptomycin is administered intravenously to treat infections caused by VR E. faecium. The antibiotic is mostly eliminated by the kidneys, but 5-10% of the dose enters the intestines, where it can drive the evolution of resistance.
To investigate whether systemic daptomycin treatment does, indeed, drive an increase in daptomycin-resistant VR E. faecium, the team inoculated mice orally with different strains of daptomycin-susceptible VR E. faecium. Beginning one day after inoculation, the researchers gave the mice daily doses of either subcutaneous daptomycin, oral daptomycin or a control mock injection for five days. The team used a range of doses and routes of administration, including those that would be similar to clinical human doses, to maximize the likelihood of observing resistance emergence. Next, they collected fecal samples from the mice to measure the extent of VR E. faecium shedding into the environment and to determine daptomycin susceptibility of the E. faecium bacteria that were present in the feces.
The researchers found that only the highest doses of daptomycin consistently reduced fecal VR E. faecium below the level of detection, whereas lower doses resulted in VR E. faecium shedding. From the bacteria that were shed, the team found that one strain acquired a mutation in a gene that had previously been described in association with daptomycin resistance, while another acquired several mutations that had not previously been associated with daptomycin resistance.
“Our experiments show that daptomycin resistance can emerge in E. faecium that has colonized the GI tract, and that this resistance can arise through a variety of genetic mutations,” said Morley.
The team also observed that daptomycin-resistant bacteria were shed even when the daptomycin was administered subcutaneously.
Finally, the team investigated whether the orally administered adjuvant cholestyramine — an FDA-approved bile-acid sequestrant — could reduce daptomycin activity in the GI tract and prevent the emergence of daptomycin-resistant E. faecium in the gut. They found that cholestyramine reduced fecal shedding of daptomycin-resistant VR E. faecium in daptomycin-treated mice by up to 80-fold.
“We have shown that cholestyramine binds the antibiotic daptomycin and can function as an ‘anti-antibiotic’ to prevent systemically administered daptomycin from reaching the gut,” said Read.
Amit Pai, professor and chair of the Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan, noted that no new strategies have been developed to reduce antimicrobial resistance beyond the use of combination therapy, the development of vaccines for upper and lower respiratory tract infections and simply reducing the unnecessary use of antibiotics.
“These are blunt instruments for antimicrobial resistance reduction at the population level but do not readily translate to an intervention that can be used in individuals,” said Pai. “Reducing selective antibiotic pressure on bacteria that reside in the colon is a potential individual-level strategy that deserves greater attention.”
Other Penn State authors on the paper include Derek Sim, senior research assistant; Samantha Olson, undergraduate student; Lindsey Jackson, undergraduate student; Elsa Hansen, assistant research professor; Grace Usher, graduate student; and Scott Showalter, professor of chemistry. Authors from the University of Michigan include Clare Kinnear, postdoctoral research fellow, and Robert Woods, assistant professor of internal medicine.
The Penn State Eberly College of Science and the Eberly Family Trust supported this research.